This is believed to have been the first documented instance that such an attack had purposefully taken place, perhaps even the first documented case of germ warfare. Sadly, it would be repeated over and over again as first colonists, and then Americans following the Revolution, operating under the doctrine of Manifest Destiny engaged in a centuries-long campaign of genocide against the indigenous people of North America.
Current estimates of the total number of Indigenous people in North America at the time of the first Columbus voyage range from 10 million on the conservative side, to more than 100 million. Though, in 1492 Columbus was not the first European to reach the shores of North America, he did not actually set foot on the continent.
For the first century following 1492 most encounters were with ships of traders who at first made only brief stops along the coast to trade goods for furs to be sold in the lucrative European market.
Though it was not unusual for them to take slaves to assist in the financial rewards of their voyage. This was usually done by deception. Inviting the native people aboard the ship and then seizing them.
The backstory of the Chocorua legend and the historic context within which it was said to have taken place involves Two great Indian linguistic families that dominated the eastern United States, the Algonquians and the Iroquoians.
The realm of the Algonquians stretched from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes and beyond, and from the Carolinas to Hudson Bay. Within this area was a small section where the Iroquois ranged and ruled - Mostly northernmost sections of the eastern US and Canada.
Although not living in New Hampshire, the Iroquois certainly ventured into the State for hunting and sometimes against their Abenaki neighbors.
Today, the term Algonquian is now more of an anthropological characterization, because the various groups were among a large number of tribes that spoke various dialects of the Algonquian language.
But Native American nations that have a connection to the early Algonquian people today come from a vast array of nations all across the country, including the Cheyenne of the great plains, the Yurok in California, the Cree, Chippewa, Blackfoot and Shawnee are other examples.
The Indians living in the immediate vicinity of Maine and New Hampshire are known generally by the name Abenaki although they are often referred to by their more localized groups names.
Over the centuries the Abenaki had joined with others in coalition to protect their collective interests. Before first contact those coalitions were generally to provide protection from encroachment by the Iroquois. Following first contact, the Abenaki joined in an active coalition of nations called the Wabanaki Confederacy (People of the Dawnland), formed in 1680 in response to both Iroquois and English aggression and expansionism.
The Wabanaki Confederacy never had a formal "grand chief" or single leader of the entire confederacy,. This would continue throughout the entire history of the Wabanaki Confederacy. The confederacy remained decentralized so as to never give more power to any of the member tribes. This meant that all major decisions had to be thoroughly debated by sakoms at council fires, which created a strong political culture empowering the most respected and influential leaders.
Members of the Wabanaki Confederacy were the:
(Eastern)
Abenaki or Panuwapskek (
Penobscot)
(Western)
AbenakiMÃkmaq (
Miꞌkmaq, L'nu)
Peskotomuhkati (
Passamaquoddy)
Wolastoqew, Wolastoq (
Maliseet or Malicite)
In other words, All Abenaki are Wabanaki, but not all Wabanaki are Abenaki.
The homeland of the Wabanaki Confederacy stretched from Newfoundland, Canada to the Merrimack River valley in what is now New Hampshire and Massachusetts, United States. In 1862 the colonial government declared the Wabanaki Confederacy forcibly disbanded. However, despite this, the five Wabanaki nations still continued to meet. The Confederacy was formally re-established in 1993.
The Abenaki were organized as patrilineal bands, led by sagamores (sogmoh), the heads of high-ranking families who inherited their status (often today referred to as hereditary leaders) who acted as stewards of their lineages and homelands. Sachems (sakhem) were elected leaders of allied bands.
Today, Chocorua is spoken of in reference to both a man and the mountain which ostensibly bears his name.
Let's first start with the Mountain.
There may have been previous Abenaki names accorded to the mountain that now bears the name Chocorua, after all the Algonquin people - of which the Abenaki were a sub-group - had been in the region for at least 12 thousand years.
The first mention within the written record seems to have come from Jeremy Belknap in 1784. Belknap was a well-known historian and writer who first referred to the Mountain as Corua, an Algonquin/Abenaki word roughly translated as "place of serpents" probably for the snakes regularly found in the watershed region. the Northern Water Snake (Nerodia sipedon) is found within the Mt. Chocorua watershed today.
Seven years later in 1791, Belknap refers to the mountain as Chocorua. There's no evidence to indicate how or when Belknap had learned this version of the name but it is likely that the rest of the name sprung from another word - Choc, an Abenaki word meaning rocky outcrop. This appears consistent with the Abenaki name for Mt. Washington, Agiocochook, as well as several Canadian mountains and ranges, whose names also contain the sound.
Its also worth noting that the Mountains in New Hampshire that bear the names of other Native Americans, created by white colonists and their descendants, were named many years after the individuals for whom they were named had died. Including the names of many that never likely walked these woods and hills. The Abenaki names for these mountains, if they existed, were replaced by those colonists and have largely been lost to time.
The name Chocorua for the mountain, however, predates the naming of these other mountains.
According to historian Mary Ellen Lepionka, "The mountain would (probably) already have had its name from pre-contact times, well before there was any individual to be recorded in 18th-century history or folklore.
The first written mention by Belknap, referring to the mountain, pond, and river, and came nearly 50 years after European contact, and it was another 30 years after that before the word Chocorua appears in records along with reference to a person by that name."
As for Chocorua the man, according to the legend - which appears in various forms - particularly with respect to Chocorua's death, had moved away from the villages of the remaining Pequaket Abenaki - ostensibly because he wanted to live in peace.
The story of Chocorua and the family of a Scottish pioneer named Cornelius Campbell is said to have taken place in the 1720s. This was approximately 40-50 years after the formation of the Wabanaki Confederacy, formed in response to the growing threat from the two main colonial powers, England and France, as well as territorial threats from the Iroquois.
According to the legend, Chocorua was already an adult with a young son, he is said to have lost his wife to disease shortly after his son's birth. According to the legend. Chocorua befriended Cornelius Campbell, who had settled in the area around what was known first as Burton, then as Albany and is today called Tamworth.
According to the story Chocorua had sufficient confidence in his relationship with Cornelius Campbell and his family that he was willing to leave his son in the care of the Campbell family. One day Chocorua was called away for tribal business and asked if the Campbells could watch his young son while he was gone.
While Chocorua was away, the boy found and drank or ate poison that Cornelius Campbell had made to kill wolves and foxes. Chocorua returned to find his son had died.
Chocorua, distraught with grief, took revenge on the family, while Campbell was away. Shortly thereafter, Campbell returned home to find his wife and children had been slain.
Campbell suspected Chocorua and pursued him up the mountain that today bears his name.
Chocorua climbed atop the highest boulder on the summit and, knowing that death was at hand, raised his arms to the sky and shouted a curse:
Now, I'm going to read the most common version of his curse here, mostly because it is so clearly recounted by someone speaking with the "King's English" - if you will - that it is amusing and a clear red flag within the context of the story.
“A curse upon ye, white men! May the Great Spirit curse ye when he speaks in the clouds, and his words are fire! Chocorua had a son—and ye killed him while the sky looked bright! Lightning blast your crops! Wind and fire destroy your dwellings! The Evil Spirit breathe death upon your cattle! Your graves lie in the war-path of the Indian! Panthers howl, and wolves fatten over your bones! Chocorua goes to the Great Spirit—his curse stays with the white men!”
Here various accounts have Chocorua shot by Campbell or committing suicide by jumping from the mountain falling to his death on the rocks below.
Most "accounts" of the man whom legend refers to as Chocorua call him "Chief" Chocorua.
Although the Abenaki did not have such a term at the time of first contact. Many years later they - and most other tribes and nations would yield to the European conventions, but at the time of first contact, Algonquin (of which the Abenaki, remember, were a sub-group) Leaders were either elected Sachems or heriditary leaders called Sagamores. So the individual referenced as "Chief" would not have actually been a “chief”.
If Chocorua inhabitated this lofty position among his people his name would certainly have been oft repeated in the oral histories of his people - as were Kancamaugus, Paugus, Passaconaway and Wonalancet. It is not.
If he had held either an elected position or a hereditary one, or if he had been a warrior, as is often depicted, he would not have lived separate from his people as the myth itself holds. He would have lived right in the thick of things - so when the Pequawkets, fleeing from the scalp hunters and English onslaught, moved north to St Francis and its environs Chocorua would have gone with them or joined another local grouping of Abenaki.
Later colonial legends depict him leading both the Cocheco "Massacre" in Dover in 1689 and the Battle of Lovewell Pond in 1725, well over 100 years after he was said to have met and befriended the Scottish immigrant Campbell.
The battle at - what is today called - Lovewell Pond, in Fryeburg Maine, is considered to have been a draw, with serious losses on both sides. Both Captain Lovewell, commander of the scalp hunters, and Abenaki war leader Paugus perished in the fighting.
The historic records show that the Abenaki leader Paugus died at Lovewell Pond and the colonial scalp hunters proudly and ceremoniously presented his scalp upon their return from the battle, collecting 100 pounds for his scalp alone.
No mention of Chocorua is included in the English written records of this battle. Nor is there any mention of a Chocorua in Abenaki oral tradition. Since Lovewell Pond was the last major battle before the remaining Abenaki moved north to Quebec, participation by a warrior named Chocorua would quite likely have been prominently featured in storytelling about the battle.
Let me interject a quick word about scalping here. For many years the practice of scalping victims of a fight was attributed almost solely to Native American fighters but - in fact - it was a common colonial practice and several so-called colonial "Scalp Acts" were passed encouraging the taking of scalps and paying very high bounties on such scalps.
In the early days of conflict between European colonists and native people there was no organized military and the fighting was between what we would today consider mercenaries, sometimes referred to as Rangers, who were paid based on the number of scalps taken and the value of slaves taken.
So, A Chief Chocorua is not mentioned in Abenaki legends, and there is no leader by that name in surviving Abenaki oral traditions, as one would expect of someone in such a revered position. Early English primary-source accounts also do not mention any Chief Chocorua.
The best guess of the genesis of the Chocorua legend itself is that it involves a bit of a mashup. The seeds were probably planted by local legend and an 1815 short story written by Longfellow about an Indian named Jeckoyva who became lost in the woods and died of starvation - an unlikely scenario for a Native American.
15 years after Longfellow's story, another fictional account, written in 1830 by Lydia Maria Francis, better known by the name Lydia Marie Child (1802-1880), who had also written other popular fictional stories, one titled "Hobomock". These were then likely woven into the tapestry.
The legend evolved over time until it was recorded in the notes of the famed landscape painter Thomas Cole who paused on a trip to the Conway area for a few days in Tamworth and hiked Mt Chocorua during his stay (1886).
The impression made on Cole was not only documented in words but in the winter of 1828-29 Cole painted one of his most celebrated works "The Death of Chocorua". A full century after the events had been said to have taken place, this painting fired the legend of Chocorua in the public's imagination.
Like a children's game of telephone - for the young people, that was a game where the first child in a circle would begin by whispering a phrase in the ear of the next child in line and everyone would enjoy a good laugh when the last child would audibly speak the phrase surviving its evolution - of course it would be completely different from when it began upon completed the circle.
So the legend of this fellow - now named Chocorua evolved among local folks and visitors, morphing from the highly unbelievable story in Longfellow's tale to a "Chief" who was friendly with many of the settlers and particularly the family of Cornelius Campbell.
Accordingly, while Chocorua’s bones bleached in the sun, his curse settled on Albany and great calamity befell it from hurricanes and hailstorms to cattle dying mysteriously. Ultimately the settlers of the area moved to other areas and Campbell became a hermit and was found dead two years later.
So the existence of Chief Chocorua is likely what today we call fake news. He likely never actually existed.
Nor, by the way, is there any evidence in the written record of a Cornelius Campbell, except in association with the legend. Had Campbell been a real person it is likely that there would be some record of the man who ostensibly ended the life of the "Great Chocorua". Surely when his body was "discovered" two years after the events on the summit of Mount Chocorua were said to have taken place he would have been buried in a well-marked grave somewhere in the Ossipee Range. But the record remains blank.
I spoke with Jeremy Osgood, author of "Carved in Granite" a fictional account of the legend of Chocorua and here's an encapsulation of what he had to say.
He found not evidence for the existence of either Chocorua or Cornelius Campbell - outside of the specific legend. As for the legend itself the most cogent version came from a Chamber of Commerce (obviously written hundreds of years after the period depicted in the legend.)
Note: A Recording of Osgood, from a yet-to-be-released Podcast about his book, is included in the podcast.For those inclined toward historic fiction and the romantic legend of Chocorua, "Carved in Granite" is a good read, and a plausible depiction of the story sensitively written, but not romanticized, providing insight into not only the legend but the tableau in which it developed from Osgood's obviously rich imagination. Osgood weaves a tale that is believable and consistent with the bloody and savage life that existed at the time whether you were Native or colonist, particularly if you were trying to live a life that was free of the warring colonial empires that fomented so much of the violence that defined the ongoing genocide of Indigenous people.
But if this is true - if Chocorua and Cornelius Campbell were nothing more than figments of colonial settlers' imaginations, how is it that such a rich and evocative narrative developed about these men and the mountain in whose shadow they were said to have lived?
Jeremy Osgood, ponders the following observation which encapsulates the same questions. He notes that one has to wonder if the phrase "where there's smoke, there's fire." applies here as an unasked thought or observation. In other words: How does such a rich and interesting story develop if it is made up out of whole cloth?
For a clue about that I spoke with NH Secrets, Legends & Lore's official historian Darryl Thompson of Gilmanton Iron Works. Darryl is a graduate of UNH, where he and I became friends. He is also the son of the legendary "Bud" Thompson who founded both Canterbury Shaker Village and the Mount Kearsarge Indian Museum. He grew up steeped in history so it's no wonder that he became a repository for so many of the stories that define our state and our country.
In a nutshell, Darryl says, "legends like this usually develop because they serve to help tell a story about us or about the time in which the story takes place."
Now this where I, admittedly, wander into the deep woods of speculation.
Let me begin by saying that - despite the casual and simplistic interpretation of myth as falsehood - the term myth is far more complex than that. Myths, as Darryl Thompson says, symbolize ideas, values, history and other issues that are important to a people. Parts of the myth may be true or false, dull or engagingly fantastic; their significance is their meaning, not their specific narrative content.
We have already seen that the beginnings of the myth of Chocorua developed over 100 years - after the supposed events - before anyone gave the mythic Native American of this story a name, probably based upon the Abenaki name for the Mountain.
It's generally accepted that for a mountain to bear the name of an Abenaki man or woman that coincidence most likely occurred in the fullness of time. In other words, it would happen as a historic tribute, not as a co-terminal event.
It would have been considered bad luck, for example, to name a mountain for an individual who had just been murdered on its summit. If only because the repetition of the name might be presumed to be a call capable of summoning the spirit - in not necessarily good humor, I might add.
Mary Ann Lapoinka speculates that "he may have been a composite persona with an emblematic identity representing the local group of Native Americans as a whole. This conflation of identities was a common practice in life as well as in fiction, in which a single person, real or invented, hero or villain became famous as a projection or representation of the larger population. "
The Chocorua legend evolved in a region that was the most dangerous area of all New England at the time, the tip of the spear if you will. It was also an area where even the most simple aspects of survival, the growing of crops, and raising a family, were an existential challenge.
Within a few years of the time in which this story was said to have taken place, all of the European settlers had moved out of Albany because their crops- especially corn and wheat, would not grow in the cold climate and hail. Wind, rain, and flooding added additional challenges to their existence.
Finally, when cattle began to die from an unexplained sickness they called the "Burton Ail" it was all just too much and they moved to the more hospitable climes in Conway, Bartlett and Fryeburg, Maine.
Over the decades these things and the legend of Chocorua, evolved, entwining themselves into the legend.
Some claimed that the curse of Chocorua explained all these tragedies, but it is far more likely that these tragedies were woven into the story itself, along with Campbell and Chocorua.
One can easily see how some aspects of the legend of his curse may have evolved purely from the vagaries of the climate in this high mountain intervale.
The "Burton Ail" added additional fuel to the fire, though it was discovered years later that the region had a high concentration of murate of lime in the ground which was causing the cattle to die.
For those colonists who were attempting to build a new life as well as Native people who were facing a genocide, intent on extirpating them from the land that had been their home for thousands of years, it seems the die was cast.
Even in instances where friendships developed between Native people and colonists - and there were surely cases where this happened - the relationships were doomed to end in tragedy.
The way in which the story has been crafted over generations - from the perspective of Colonial people for whom superstition was more likely to guide their thinking than science, "explains" why they would tell and retell this legend and, further, makes both Chocorua and Campbell the sad and inevitable victims of circumstance beyond their control.
Whether, in the telling of this tale, European colonists were attempting to rewrite the historic record to alleviate their own guilt for the genocide inflicted on the Abenaki people or simply reflecting the ignorance and superstition of the times, ultimately the story reveals a truth underneath decades and centuries of fabrication and prevarication.
It became the story that explained the sad complexity and savagery of life "at the edge of the world". Where even the best of intentions fell victim to the ignorance of common folks and the greed and the evil of men bent on empire and the elimination of Native people.
We will never know what intentions existed in the hearts and minds of many of those who crafted this legend. Most of them were but proxies in the march to Empire. but we know that the genocide happened and that cannot be changed.
Yet, still, the Abenaki live on. Many, like my great-grandmother because they quietly blended into the background while still maintaining their cultural memory - until it was safe to reemerge. Others persisted like the Red Oak, remaining strong in the winds of time. Passing on their culture and wisdom to succeeding generations.
Now they have their own story to tell that just might help us all to live more gently on this good earth. If only we have ears and hearts to listen.
The show notes for this episode can be found at NHSecrets.blogspot.com. Where you can find more information and links. You can make a contribution directly to the Mount Kearsarge Indian museum by going to their website: IndianMuseum.org . Or, you may go to my art gallery site, WayneDKing.com and choose from among my original art, under the MK Indian Museum Heading and 1/2 of the purchase price will be donated in your name to the Indian Museum. You will receive a signed, numbered, limited edition original image printed on fine art museum quality rag paper and the good folks at the Indian Museum will gratefully receive your donation.
Notes and Links
Wabanaki Confederacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabanaki_ConfederacyWPA (dated) history of Indians of NH - worth a read
https://www.livingplaces.com/NH/New_Hampshire_Indians.htmlIndigenous New Hampshire
Indigenousnh.com
Carved in Granite - Jeremy Osgood author
Order the book hereChocorua Redux: Revisionist History of a Name
Mary Ellen Lepionka
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c6c20254d8711284e8b9a6b/t/5d0bee26d7c9fe00010ea0ac/1561062950571/Chocorua+Redux.pdfImportant summary pointsNative American Indians had a completely different cultural map by which their lives were lived and governed. Ownership of land was not part of their culture. The notion of selling land was akin to selling your mother, or grandmother.
Most, if not all, Indian cultures were "sharing cultures". A persons "worth" or status within the community was measured by what he, or she, shared with others. In other words, where individuals from the European cultures were judged by what they accumulated, a "great man or woman" among Indian people was one who generously gave away his or her possessions, shared his food, helped to feed her people, provided for the community in good times and bad.
On the other hand, European cultures were often composed of people who had been forced to "share" by those who ruled them or by the government thru taxation of one sort or another.
Religious traditions for most, if not all, Native people were not enforced upon other members of the community. Their spirituality was tied to the land and a belief that all creatures, and most often all animate and even inanimate things had a spirit that defined them and made them worthy of respect and honor: two-legged, four-legged, those that flew, crawled and slithered, even. Taking the life of a fellow creature was done with reverence and recognition for the spirit of the animal.
You may remember from earlier in this episode that I remarked upon the unusual nature of the marriage between my great grandfather and grandmother, noting that they were traditional enemies. It is true that there was conflict over the more than 10,000 years that the Abenaki and the Iroquois had inhabited the lands of the northeast but what additionally made the conflicts much worse was that each nation had become the pawns of two (often) warring colonial powers, largely as a survival strategy on their parts. Regular war and ongoing conflict between the French and the English was the rule, not the exception, with the Iroquois Confederacy allying itself with the English and the Abenaki siding with the French.
